How Commandr compares
All three use AI to help you build software, but they take on different parts of the job. Here’s what each one is best at.

Commandr
A crew of specialist agentsBest for taking an idea all the way to a finished app, with a specialist for each step.
- Any model, even local
- Apple silicon Macs
Cursor
An AI code editorBest for writing code yourself, with autocomplete as you type and an agent built into the editor.
- Built on VS Code
- Mac, Windows, Linux
Claude Code
A coding agentBest for handing tasks to an agent in your codebase, from the terminal, your editor or CI.
- Terminal, VS Code, JetBrains
- Mac, Windows, Linux
Where Commandr leads
Built into Commandr, each handled by its own specialist agent. Cursor and Claude Code can do these if you ask, but they aren’t built in.
Models and privacy
Which models you can use, and where your requests go.
Where Cursor and Claude Code lead
What they do that Commandr doesn’t, yet.
The basics
What all three get right.
Checked against each product’s own docs. Commandr isn’t affiliated with Anysphere or Anthropic; Cursor and Claude Code are trademarks of their owners.
Sources and how to read the marks
A half mark means partly, and the note says what it covers. A cross under “Where Commandr leads” means there’s no such step built in, though you can ask its agent for something similar.
Cursor: Agent, Tab, CLI, Cloud agents, VS Code, Models, API keys, Download, Pricing.
Claude Code: Overview, Setup, VS Code, JetBrains, Headless, GitHub Actions, On the web, Models, Gateways, Checkpointing, Subagents, Pricing.
Try the whole crew, free.
Commandr is free during the beta. Bring your own key, or run a local model for nothing.